Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1038

reference
946-tree-1
name
1038
tree-preservation-order

undefined

946-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.022674 50.876307)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.022561 50.876295,-1.022566 50.876317,-1.022582 50.876337,-1.022606 50.876354,-1.022638 50.876364,-1.022673 50.876368,-1.022708 50.876365,-1.022740 50.876355,-1.022766 50.876339,-1.022782 50.876319,-1.022788 50.876297,-1.022783 50.876275,-1.022767 50.876254,-1.022742 50.876238,-1.022711 50.876228,-1.022676 50.876224,-1.022641 50.876227,-1.022609 50.876237,-1.022583 50.876253,-1.022567 50.876273,-1.022561 50.876295)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL